Leading for the Future: Balancing Skills and Knowledge in a Changing Workforce
In a job interview once, I was asked the question “Are you in teaching for the love of the subject, or for the love of teaching?”. I remember at the time thinking “I have no idea what answer you want from me here”. I was whole heartedly in it for the love of teaching! Which I exclaimed with buckets of enthusiasm! But I had be burned for this attitude before, with previous interview panels unimpressed by my non-core discipline degree. I have always been of the view that absolutely yes, a knowledge base is essential but ultimately knowledge can be learned, what truly makes a great teacher is the ability to engage students and foster their curiosity and teach them the skills to find things out for themselves. Real life is not separated out into subjects, it is complicated, integrated and colourful. It takes many routes that are not standardised.
Across education, business, and policy, there’s a long-standing debate about the relative importance of skills versus knowledge. Some argue that in the age of Google and AI, knowing facts is less valuable than the nuance of critical thinking and problem solving. Others warn that without a foundational knowledge, skills are untethered and surface, with individuals confused in how to work with the information they have.
For teachers, this debate is not theoretical- it’s deeply practical. It directly influences what we teach and when, how we teach it, and how students experience learning. As teachers, we have ultimate responsibility for equipping students with critical content and the capabilities to apply that content in real-world contexts. However, in reality, we are restricted here.
The Current State of Our Education System
In England, recent decades have seen a clear shift toward a knowledge-rich curriculum, particularly following reforms led by Michael Gove during his tenure as Education Secretary (2010–2014). These reforms were grounded in the belief that all children, regardless of background, deserve access to a core body of knowledge that builds cultural capital and academic rigour (DfE, 2013). The 2014 National Curriculum for England reflects this, placing strong emphasis on subject-specific content and detailed knowledge acquisition. Whilst there is clear intent to ensure rigour, equity, and depth of knowledge, this knowledge-heavy focus limits space for developing transferable skills, application and critical thinking and instead leads to high-stakes environments heavily reliant on rote learning and memory.
Furthermore, national assessments (e.g., SATs, GCSEs, A-levels) heavily influence school rankings, inspection outcomes (e.g., Ofsted judgments), and funding decisions. As Gillborn & Youdell (2000) explain how these pressures often push teachers to focus narrowly on test-related content, sometimes at the expense of broader, transferable skill development. There is little space for anything else.
As we are all too aware, especially with the sudden boom in artificial intelligence (AI) that occurred a little over 18 months ago, the requirements of our workforce are changing. As automation and AI continue to develop and reshape job roles, McKinsey & Company (2018) predict that up to 375 million workers globally may need to shift occupational categories and develop entirely new skill sets for example in complex problem-solving, critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and active learning (World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report, 2020).
This is further reflected in the UK, where the Learning and Work Institute (2020) also identified a significant gap between the skills young people are developing in formal education and the skills employers expect—particularly in teamwork, resilience, and decision-making. These projections suggest a decisive shift in workforce priorities from purely academic knowledge to the adaptive and transferable skills required to thrive in increasingly dynamic, cross-disciplinary roles. Such a knowledge-heavy focus may unintentionally marginalise key 21st century skills that students need to thrive in adulthood and restrict the economy. The future workforce is changing and as such so does our education system.
This system creates a paradox: schools are under pressure to deliver measurable academic results, yet society increasingly demands that schools prepare students for complex, adaptive, and uncertain futures.
The Changing Nature of Work
Research from the World Economic Forum and McKinsey highlights a seismic shift in global labour demands. The fastest-growing roles increasingly require:
Digital fluency
Creative problem-solving
Emotional intelligence
Collaboration across cultures and disciplines
These changes are not only about technology- they reflect a broader move toward soft skills, meta-learning, and resilience in uncertain environments. The workforce of the future won't just ask, "What do you know?" but "What can you do with what you know?" And our future workforce needs to be prepared for this.
The Teacher’s Evolving Role
Whilst curriculum reform maintains a knowledge-based approach, teachers themselves must master the duality: they need the disciplinary depth to teach meaningfully, and the pedagogical agility to foster essential skills. As the debate continues, teachers stand at the intersection- where knowing meets doing.
As such, teachers are no longer just deliverers of content. They are:
Facilitators of inquiry
Mentors in skill development
Designers of personalised learning experiences
Role models for curiosity, critical thinking and problem solving
This evolution means that teachers themselves need a recalibrated balance of knowledge (deep understanding of curriculum, pedagogy, and discipline) and skills (adaptability, collaboration, technology integration, data literacy).
Knowledge Without Skills? Limited.
A teacher may master a subject but struggle to engage students without communication skills, cultural awareness, or classroom management expertise. In a world where students must apply knowledge in real-time, teachers must model and mentor those applications—not just recite information.
Skills Without Knowledge? Hollow.
On the flip side, emphasising skills alone without robust content knowledge can produce superficial learning. Teachers must scaffold critical thinking and creativity with depth, context, and accuracy. Skills and knowledge are not either/or—they are mutually reinforcing.
So Where Does This Leave Teachers?
To meet these demands, systems must invest in ongoing professional learning that:
Encourages reflection on teaching practice
Builds fluency in digital tools and data use
Strengthens cultural competence and inclusion
Promotes interdisciplinary thinking
Moreover, future-ready professional development should mirror the very skills teachers are expected to teach their students: self-awareness, flexibility, curiosity, and a growth mindset. This starts with the teacher understanding themselves on both a personal and professional level and with the tools to observe and reflect on their own practice.
What Does This Mean For Leaders?
For school leaders, this shift in workforce expectations demands more than incremental change- it calls for a fundamental reimagining of what education is for. In Reinventing Education: Beyond the Knowledge Economy, Watkins and Silver (2025) argue that education must evolve from a model designed to produce knowledge workers to one that cultivates creative, adaptive problem-solvers equipped to thrive in complex, fast-changing environments.
Leaders are thus positioned not just as implementers of policy, but as architects of transformation- responsible for reshaping schools into spaces where emotional intelligence, systems thinking, and collaborative problem-solving are nurtured alongside academic knowledge.
This involves rethinking curricula, assessment methods, and professional development to prioritise human development alongside academic achievement. By embracing this paradigm shift, leaders can create educational environments that not only impart knowledge but also empower learners with the skills and mindsets necessary for success in the 21st-century workforce.
However, this vision sits in tension with the structural realities identified by Gillborn and Youdell (2000) which continues to reinforce educational inequality and constrains the very creativity, autonomy, and skill development that Watkins and Silver advocate. If leaders are to genuinely shift schools toward future-ready learning environments, they must confront the entrenched systems that limit equitable access to broad, meaningful educational experiences and life opportunities. This means not only balancing knowledge and skills but actively resisting reductive performance metrics that narrow both the curriculum and the student experience.
The Synergy of Knowing and Doing
As we prepare students for a future we cannot fully predict, we must empower teachers and leaders to be agile, informed, and inspired. The future belongs not to those who only know, or only do- but to those who understand how to bring knowledge and skills together in meaningful, transformative ways.
The classroom of the future is not just a place of information transfer- it's a launchpad for capability.
If you are interested in exploring transformative coaching or team opportunities further for either yourself or your teams, we would be delighted to discuss how we can work together. Please book a free introductory call or contact us at info@glasshouselab.com.
You can also sign up to our newsletter to stay in touch and develop your awareness.
Purchase your copy of Reinventing Education: Beyond the Knowledge Economy
References:
Department for Education. (2013). The national curriculum in England: Framework document. [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4. Accessed 6 May 2025
Gillborn, D. & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing Education: Policy, Practice, Reform and Equity. Open University Press.
Learning and Work Institute. (2020). Getting the Basics Right: The Case for Action on Essential Skills.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2018). Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation.
World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report.
Watkins, A. & Silver, M. (2025). Reinventing Education: Beyond the Knowledge Economy. London: Routledge